<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wired Vision &#187; Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredvision.com/category/web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredvision.com</link>
	<description>Home to Keith McLaughlin, Freelance Web Developer from Dublin, Ireland.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress + TwinHelix &#8216;IEPNGFIX&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2009/06/27/wordpress-twinhelix-iepngfix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2009/06/27/wordpress-twinhelix-iepngfix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iepngfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TwinHelix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are having trouble getting the IE PNG FIX from TwinHelix to work in your WordPress theme, make sure that you set the correct path to the .htc file in your themes stylesheet. /* To fix IE 6 or &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2009/06/27/wordpress-twinhelix-iepngfix/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2009/06/27/wordpress-twinhelix-iepngfix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard Web Fonts Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser safe fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good while back I asked about Standard Web Fonts. According to my stats app, it turns out that a lot of other people are also interested in finding out the answer. I was going to put together a detailed &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bother with web standards!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite the statement huh? No, I&#8217;m not saying it, but Microsoft essentially are. According to The Register&#8217;s article &#8216;Microsoft breaks IE8 interoperability promise&#8216;, Microsoft intend on displaying a broken page icon next to all web pages that are standards compliant. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A List Apart Web Design Survey 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you taken it? Well, you should. The banner even says so]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough with SXSW!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough already with the SXSW blog entries. I&#8217;m sick and tired of hearing about it. Move on, please!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Design</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can see the new design is live, and to be quite frank, it&#8217;s long overdue. Looking at the previous design day-to-day really bugged me, but I had a million other things that kept me from finishing this design. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Design = Almost Done!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/01/new-design-almost-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/01/new-design-almost-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/01/new-design-almost-done/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It feels like it&#8217;s only been about a week since I moved to the new host. That&#8217;s the reason the new design is not yet live (not really a reason, I know). But it&#8217;s nearly finished. Below is a little &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/01/new-design-almost-done/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/01/new-design-almost-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Choice of CSS Book?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you could only choose one CSS book for your shelf or library, which one would it be and why? Below is some reference material to help aid in your decision Spring into HTML and CSS Beginning CSS Web Development: &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drop 800&#215;600?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/05/drop-800600/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/05/drop-800600/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 03:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress theme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7% of my visitors use a screen resolution of 800&#215;600 or below. My question to you is&#8230; should I drop that resolution from my next wordpress theme (which I&#8217;m about to start working on)? I&#8217;m not sure myself. If it &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/05/drop-800600/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/05/drop-800600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Standards &amp; Doctypes?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that I don&#8217;t know enough about web standards. I&#8217;ve been designing web sites for several years and have known about web standards for only the last few years. In order to learn as much &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

