<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wired Vision &#187; html</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredvision.com/tag/html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredvision.com</link>
	<description>Home to Keith McLaughlin, Freelance Web Developer from Dublin, Ireland.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bother with web standards!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite the statement huh? No, I&#8217;m not saying it, but Microsoft essentially are. According to The Register&#8217;s article &#8216;Microsoft breaks IE8 interoperability promise&#8216;, Microsoft intend on displaying a broken page icon next to all web pages that are standards compliant. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A List Apart Web Design Survey 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you taken it? Well, you should. The banner even says so]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Choice of CSS Book?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you could only choose one CSS book for your shelf or library, which one would it be and why? Below is some reference material to help aid in your decision Spring into HTML and CSS Beginning CSS Web Development: &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Standards &amp; Doctypes?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that I don&#8217;t know enough about web standards. I&#8217;ve been designing web sites for several years and have known about web standards for only the last few years. In order to learn as much &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Design Point Redesigned</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web Design Point (a site for web design articles) has been redesigned to comply with web standards (XHTML 1.0 Transitional). The layout is based on Layout 14 from the Layout Gala, with some minor tweaks to get the desired result. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Code: Web Authoring Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/01/26/google-code-web-authoring-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/01/26/google-code-web-authoring-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2005 we did an analysis of a sample of slightly over a billion documents, extracting information about popular class names, elements, attributes, and related metadata. Some interesting things I picked up from the study are: A whole slew &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/01/26/google-code-web-authoring-statistics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/01/26/google-code-web-authoring-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Book Search</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/18/google-book-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/18/google-book-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Backlash and confusion have dogged Google&#8217;s plans to scan millions of books, and, while continuing with its efforts, it has opted for a name change from Google Print to Google Book Search. Fully Story &#8220;We don&#8217;t think that this new &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/18/google-book-search/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/18/google-book-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call yourself a Web Professional</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/16/call-yourself-a-web-professional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/16/call-yourself-a-web-professional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of people have been talking about whether or not those that refuse to adopt web standards in web design should be entitled to call themselves web professionals. While I agree that those who design should be looking to learn &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/16/call-yourself-a-web-professional/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/11/16/call-yourself-a-web-professional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/10/03/top-ten-web-design-mistakes-of-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/10/03/top-ten-web-design-mistakes-of-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s report on the Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 2005. 1. Legibility Problems 2. Non-Standard Links 3. Flash 4. Content That&#8217;s Not Written for the Web 5. Bad Search 6. Browser Incompatibility 7. Cumbersome Forms 8. No &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/10/03/top-ten-web-design-mistakes-of-2005/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/10/03/top-ten-web-design-mistakes-of-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art and Science of Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/07/03/the-art-and-science-of-web-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/07/03/the-art-and-science-of-web-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Veen is giving away a free download (pdf) of his book &#8211; The Art and Science of Web Design Visit Site]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2005/07/03/the-art-and-science-of-web-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

