<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wired Vision &#187; web standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredvision.com/tag/web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredvision.com</link>
	<description>Home to Keith McLaughlin, Freelance Web Developer from Dublin, Ireland.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Standard Web Fonts Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser safe fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good while back I asked about Standard Web Fonts. According to my stats app, it turns out that a lot of other people are also interested in finding out the answer. I was going to put together a detailed &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/10/27/standard-web-fonts-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bother with web standards!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite the statement huh? No, I&#8217;m not saying it, but Microsoft essentially are. According to The Register&#8217;s article &#8216;Microsoft breaks IE8 interoperability promise&#8216;, Microsoft intend on displaying a broken page icon next to all web pages that are standards compliant. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2008/09/02/dont-bother-with-web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A List Apart Web Design Survey 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you taken it? Well, you should. The banner even says so]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/04/24/a-list-apart-web-design-survey-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough with SXSW!</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough already with the SXSW blog entries. I&#8217;m sick and tired of hearing about it. Move on, please!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/17/enough-with-sxsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Design</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can see the new design is live, and to be quite frank, it&#8217;s long overdue. Looking at the previous design day-to-day really bugged me, but I had a million other things that kept me from finishing this design. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2007/03/13/new-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Choice of CSS Book?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you could only choose one CSS book for your shelf or library, which one would it be and why? Below is some reference material to help aid in your decision Spring into HTML and CSS Beginning CSS Web Development: &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/12/18/your-choice-of-css-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Standards &amp; Doctypes?</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that I don&#8217;t know enough about web standards. I&#8217;ve been designing web sites for several years and have known about web standards for only the last few years. In order to learn as much &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/09/20/web-standards-doctypes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Design Point Redesigned</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web Design Point (a site for web design articles) has been redesigned to comply with web standards (XHTML 1.0 Transitional). The layout is based on Layout 14 from the Layout Gala, with some minor tweaks to get the desired result. &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/08/12/web-design-point-redesigned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My CSS Reboot</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/05/01/my-css-reboot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/05/01/my-css-reboot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can see, Wired Vision has a new design! This is inline with my CSS Reboot. The new design uses web standards instead of the old table based layout. There might be a few small issues (list items for &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/05/01/my-css-reboot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/05/01/my-css-reboot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard Web Fonts</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/03/12/standard-web-fonts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/03/12/standard-web-fonts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.103.12/~wired/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update Please see Standard Web Fonts Revisited. When choosing fonts for web pages I usually end up limiting myself to four or five (Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Trebuchet MS). Why, you ask? To make sure that the majority of visitors to &#8230; <a href="http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/03/12/standard-web-fonts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wiredvision.com/2006/03/12/standard-web-fonts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

